Category Archives: Qt

. . . born every minute

News Headline:
“The idea that everything from spoons to stones is conscious is gaining academic credibility.”
No findings yet on Trump supporters, according to scientists.

As we await the State of the Союз

News Headline: “Trump’s last speech to Congress was remarkably unremarkable.”
Easy to guess why.
Probably better in the original Russian.

In other news. . . .

News Headline: “Driver says Jesus told him to let go of the wheel before he crashed, flipped five times.”
Sometimes Jesus gets a little bored.

The halls of ivy in the news

News Headline: “Yale introduces class on ‘happiness.’ ”
The fun with students of happiness is in flunking some of them.

QT trickle-on economics update

imberly-Clark is using its corporate tax cut to fund restructuring that will include closing 10 factories and laying off 5,000 workers.

The sound of silence

News Headline:
“Trump reportedly wanted to fire Mueller; D.C. dumbstruck.”
So there is an upside to Donald Trump.
How often have we wished Washington D.C. could be struck dumb?

One step at a time

News Headline: “Students at Wisconsin high school find ‘White’ and ‘Colored’ signs at water fountain.”
All right.
Who did it?
This is supposed to wait until a second Trump term.

QT Latest Carjacker Who Didn’t Know How to Work a Stick Shift Worldwide Pinpoint Locator

Shortly after noon Wednesday, January 24, on the 2300 block of Entrada Del Sol in Las Cruces, N.M.

The Party of Lincoln 2.0, which seeks to fool enough of the people enough of the time, in the news

News Headline:
“Do Republicans still believe in democracy?”   
News Headline: “How the GOP rigs elections with gerrymandering, voter-ID laws and dark money.”
Asked and answered.

From the QT news ticker

News Headline: “Can Republicans actually govern in 2018?”
News Headline: “Has America learned its lesson on sexual misconduct?”
News Headline: “Is Trump so dense he doesn’t know he’s being used?”
News Headline: “Is Rush Limbaugh irrelevant?”
News Headline: “Does time dilation destroy quantum superposition?”
No, no, yes, increasingly, yes.
See how easy?